This week in my classes we were talking about the past, present, and the future (tenses, that is). There is a conversation in the chapter (“This Neighborhood has Changed!”) where Matt and Tanya go home to see the vast changes that have transformed their old neighborhood. Matt and Tanya see “a construction site on every corner.” The “little grocery store” where they used to buy candy is now a “multiplex cinema.” A new shopping mall is being built where their high school used to stand. “Soon,” laments Tanya, “there will be just malls and parking lots.” “That’s because everyone has a car!” exclaims Matt. “Fifty years ago, people walked everywhere. Nowadays, they drive.”
Yes, it could be anywhere in the world—but I’m betting that Matt and Tanya grew up in
Miles of nice new apartments like these are sprouting up amid the farms on the edge of the city.
What was so fascinating was that when their text asked the students to gauge whether “things have changed for better or for worse” in Matt and Tanya’s neighborhood, EVERYONE said “for better.” The authors of the text are far more nostalgic: they give the correct answer as simply “for worse.” From the first-world perspective of the textbook, such changes are shocking—neighborhood grocery stores changed into cinemas and schools into shopping malls. For my students, this sounded like progress, including the fact that people now drove everywhere instead of walking.
This entire neighborhood—only about a mile from Shi Da—was just being built when we moved here in the summer. The construction is not yet complete, but new shops are taking residence in new storefronts. At the far end of the street, you see shiny new luxury apartments still under construction.
Allen Greenspan and other cheerleaders for free market capitalism (neo-liberals) talk about capitalism as “creative destruction.” As societies embrace the market, older ways of living are destroyed but the process (in their view) is ultimately creative and desirable. New wealth generated from the “destruction” of traditional livelihoods, they argue, will lift the global masses out of poverty. I don’t endorse this view. Destruction may be wonderful for those benefiting most from the transition, but it’s pretty brutal for those who are displaced. But my students’ response would have warmed Greenspan’s heart. For them,
New construction shrouded in green mesh can be seen on almost every block. This one is on the “Second Circle Road” just about one mile south of Shi Da.
By most accounts,
New apartment complexes line the Second Circle Road. A billboard advertises the good-life to prospective tenants.
Construction requires labor provided primarily by the Chinese countryside. Peasant migrations pour into the cities for work. Tyler, my American colleague, tells me that communism has eroded the Chinese work ethic. I’m not so sure. It seems like everyone is always working and you can hear the clanging of construction sites well into the evening, even on weekends. This woman is working at a site just down our street a couple miles where I have seen roads and apartments appear out of the dust in the last three months.
Yes, those are donkey-carts loaded with bags of cement. All available labor is driving
Societies often claim to have centers that hold the essence of their character.
The same might be true today of
This is all happening in
I stopped my bike to take pictures of this wall of advertising surrounding a new construction zone on the edge of the city, and this guy stopped his bike-cart contraption to look at me.
Thanks for reading.
Dave
1 comment:
Dave -- do you see any signs that China is employing sustainable development?
Post a Comment